Snarky Day at Tarpon Talkers

We were fortunate, at out recent meeting, to have John Hobbs as a guest. He gave an inspiring talk from a CC Manual project. Then, during table topics, he really opened up and shared a bit of his life with us. I believe I commented in a previous post that we are getting treated to some great self revelations here at the Tarpon Talkers Club.

Arnie talked to us about soy products. He did not mention soy chocolate pudding in particular, but I’m sure he would be in favor of it.

Jonathan led off with an insightful talk on miserliness and thrift. The spirit of Ben Franklin was nodding in agreement in the background.

Loretta’s Table Topics came from Eric Clapton songs. A few words from a lyric was offered as a launching pad. Our youngest member, Robert, had to report on the garbled Latin lyrics from an online game. Our newest member, Alison, expressed doubt that we would meet the same people in heaven we knew on Earth. The others were just as good. Jim tried to tell us he did not know much about cocaine. Kim’s sister is a Clapton fan. And John, as I said before, shared a personal insight into his life.

The evaluations were good and helpful for the speakers. Kim set a precedent in using the word “snarky.” I’ve seen this word in blogs a good bit. Now we can all use it in the club, too. This is what made it snarky day!

Next meeting is August 11, not this week. Here are meeting assignments, so far.

Toastmaster–Arnie
Invocation/Pledge–Alison
Speakers–Robert, Kim, Pam
Master Evaluator–Loretta
Timer–open
Ah Counter, Grammarian–open
Evaluators–Elan, others
Table Topics–Jonathan

We need to resolve the question of voting and giving awards. If you have any thoughts, please leave a comment here.
Your first comment has to be approved by the moderator. After that, you can have instant gratification.

The Four R’s of Evaluation

You hear about the sandwich method. Say something sweet, then salty, then sweet. Or, maybe sour instead of salty. But, never bitter.

That’s okay for beginners. When you want to raise your evaluations to the next level, you have to go beyond this simplicity.

My answer is the four R’s of evaluation: Recognize, Report, Recommend, Review.

Start your evaluation by Recognizing the good quality of the speech, or the boldness of the attempted presentation. Either be enthusiastic because it was a really good speech, or be sympathetic and encouraging if the speaker tried something a little beyond his or her ability at that point.

You can even be both enthusiastic and sympathetic, if you set your mind to it.

Then Report on what you saw and heard that you can commend. If the speech was well organized, report on that. If eye contact, or gestures, or vocal variety was strong, make that known.

If it was a story, or a speech to inform, or to persuade, nod to that form and say what it was. In this part of the evaluation you are simply reporting, to the credit of the speaker.

When you begin to make your Recommendation, just stick to one thing if you can. This is the takeaway or take-home part of the evaluation.

You can encourage working on a weakness, and give an example of how to work on it. Even better, in my opinion, is to recommend building a strength. If you see that the speaker has a definite strength, you can recommend pushing the envelope and making it a bigger strength.

Finally, as you close your evaluation make a quick Review of the main points. In a few words recap your evaluation. That gives more form and shape to what you said. If you can hit those first three R’s in a few sentences and express enthusiastic encouragement and interest in further speeches, that would be perfect.

Giving your evaluation this form goes beyond the sandwich into expert contest evaluator territory. Mastering this method, you can expect to win.